Site statistics

34477 facts from 176 countries related to 1176 phenomena have been registered in Archive. 2799 of them were solved, another 10642 are under verification for compliance with one of the 319 versions.

16 facts have been added for last 24 hours.

Share your story

You are in "Articles" section

This section contains articles on phenomena or versions that may be interesting or useful to researchers of the unexplained facts in one way or another.

Analysis of the materials sent by the witness from Penza

Added	Wed, 04/01/2017
Источники	vl.aif.ru
Феномены	UFO
Версии	Sky Lantern

The story began with a memo "UFO in the city of Penza," published in the early version of our group website (fern-flower.ru), which draws on the materials of press about the appearance of unusual objects that the witness, a retired major of Pasanen Yuri Anatolyevich was filmed.

Bring the contents of this note.

My attention was attracted by the news of the Penza news Agency:

Quote:

A resident of Penza took the phone from the window of the nine-storey building located on the street Liadov video of an unidentified flying object. [...] The eyewitness - a former soldier who previously served in the army air defense, sees these objects for the first time. Several times this has happened during the service, and just a month ago - on the same Arbekovskoe forest.
"However, the last time the object was a different shape, but he also appeared and disappeared like this," explained the citizen.

The news was accompanied with a video:

Video hard to say, what saw pentenes, because when approaching the focus strays. Because Arbekovskoe forest UFO I see quite often, and this particular person watched it repeatedly just for the year 2012, I decided to look for more information.

Almost immediately I was able to find the newsdescribing the same events "a month ago":

Quote:

20:55 wife noticed that over the forest, the object appeared gray. I immediately went for the camera and started to shoot. After ten seconds, the object began to leave toward the horizon," - said the inhabitant of Penza Yuri Pasanen.
Benzenes sure it's not a package lifted by the wind, and not radiomodul. The man made several attempts to increase the removed material.
"When a large approximation, we can see the shape of the object and its three-dimensional image, as well as appearing and disappearing lights," - said Yuri Pasanen.

The video, which he directed, of the transmission shown in:

In the beginning there were doubts, but after this picture they disappeared:

penza_001.jpg

We have repeatedly treat and even performed a demonstration experiment with the launch of sky lantern to take pictures and videos of his behavior at the time of the flight and the fall..

After that I really decided to close sabiti, but my eye caught the news this year. The same retired major took a few more videos:

Quote:

Day to day, hour to hour, the resident of Penza Yury Anatolyevich two years in a row at the same time, watched from his window a strange object in the sky. In 2014 a resident of the street Liadov was also waiting for the right time. Suddenly on the horizon once again appears something mysterious.
"The object was descending from the top down, he was like a fly. Last year it was the shape of a ball, and then changed to pyramid. The object is hung high above the horizon. This year visually, the UFO could not be detected, although the horizon was clear. Only taking a pair of binoculars and scanned the space, I saw a little dot," he said.
The man noticed oddities in nature: "All three times before grasping an object, talking birds".
Yury believes that the floating point - to-ship off-planet beings. Otherwise it can not explain why the focus of the video object disappears. Most likely, involves a man, masked.

Video:

"Masking" of the object is then explained in the same way as in the first case - when approaching the focus strays. But one of the objects looks a little different.

penza_002.jpg

In my opinion, it's more like a parachute or a weather balloon, shot against the sun.
But this hypothesis is likely eliminated, as the object is moving down, not up. But be sure that the parachute is impossible, because the TV crew apparently filmed the TV screen, which played video. So that you can take the ribbons and parachutist, can be just defects and artifacts shooting.

Therefore - if you have this video in better quality or other information on these objects, please write in comments.

Some time after the publication of the notes he found our group and expressed a desire to provide us with the original film material. In Yuri Medvedev noted that the appearance of objects is accompanied by an unusual silence in nature and the poor health of city residents ("my throat swells and the voice disappears").

In this article we will analyze was obtained from the witness video and try to understand what the objects he was filming.

General analysis files

We were sent 6 videos in 8 files, avi and mpg (one story broken into 3 files).

Unfortunately, the video quality is not very high. All submitted standard definition video (720x576 pixels). The videos present the defects of shooting, due to the large approximation, the lack of optical stabilization of the camera and shaking hands, which is manifested in the flashing of the video image and its splitting in the analysis of the components of the video frames. This is clearly seen not only on the analyzed object, but also on the surrounding background (e.g., trees is also duplicated). One of the typical frames:

penza_nlo_001.jpg

Camera, with great difficulty, finds and keeps the focus on a sufficiently small object located at a great distance. In the result, the outlines of the object are rarely sharp, basically it is a stain of varying degrees of blur. Periodically, the camera tries to automatically focus, and in these moments of shooting the object and the surrounding landscape absolutely spreads and becomes indistinguishable.

Well, another frequently recurring feature, since the object is far away from the operator, the latter have to use a big approximation that the object became visible on the video. In the process of approximation of the operator shaking hands with excitement, the camera moves and the object does not hit the lens. The operator has to reduce the approximation, re-find the object and bring it. All this time the subject is out of focus, and flickers on the screen.

Some of the stories with comments of the author in text form. We bring them after the video in spoilers.

Comments are designed for the high-rolling frames in the video. This is the easiest way to evaluate a specific frame, but it allows you to see the scattered shots the following after indefinite intervals. The vast majority of frames when viewing in this way is ignored. As a result, the analysis is based on incomplete information. Us for a more detailed analysis of each video was extracted all the frames.

The results of the analysis of each of the subjects given below.

The first video from 19.05.12

Video from 19.05.12 (analogue sent)

The survey was conducted in 20-55. Dome-shaped object is on a decline, and then merges with the texture of the forest (15 second videos), passing in front of the trees.

penza_nlo_002_0.jpg

Object has an orange-red glow at the bottom, which is slightly attenuated at lower. It does not disappear behind the trees, as it may seem, is still visible, though the picture and get out of focus.

penza_nlo_003.jpg

By all indications, the object is a sky lantern going down.

The second video from 02.06.2012

Video from 02.06.12 (a fragment)

The whole record is 1 minute and 14 seconds. Break it up into three pieces for easier consideration of different related subjects. A fragment of the first 1 to 32 second: Object to the form of an elongated bottom of the ball with the glow at the bottom, the flare of something dark, disappears from the image on the third (3) second. Ninth to tenth (9-10) the second is on the image as a small dot in the upper right part of the image disappears completely (you can see step-by-step view). At the twelfth (12) seconds of visible briefly at the bottom left. Next, empty. A fragment of another without a space immediately after the first 32 to 43 second full material: the Object moves low on the horizon from right to left, then almost simultaneously a second object and moves top-down from left to right in the image just one second from second to third (2-3) of the fragment. Eight second (8) good image of the object. Form is the same as in the first fragment of a ball with the glow at the bottom. Note the behavior of the two objects during their movement in steps – object split in two, but in different directions and not always the same as their is a split with a split of the lanterns on the pillars at the bottom of the image. I was under the impression that the objects themselves are split, their split does not match with each other and with the terrain, that is not shaking this camera, otherwise the whole picture is split equally. But that's my opinion. Check shooting other moving remote objects and will let You know the outcome. Viewing split objects from step to step ( from 2 to 3 seconds). The word "split" is missing in the text, indicate only the direction of bifurcation from a clearly visible object. 1.- right across, the Lights clearly. 2.- right clearly. 3.- right – left-down, Lights – down to the right. 4.- right – horizontal, Left – vertical. Lights – clear. 5.- right - right-down, Left – right-up, Lights – down to the right. 6.- right - right-down, Left – clear Lights right down. 7.- the right substantially horizontally, the Left a little bit vertically. 8.- the right substantially horizontally, but in the other direction relative to the previous step Left slightly vertical Lights – clear. 9.- right – up Left – down right, Lights – clear. 10.- right – horizontal, Left down to the right. 11.- right clearly with a barely noticeable split, the Left – forked. 12.- right clearly Left – forked. 13.- right clearly Left – forked. 14.- clearly the right and the Left divided Lights – clear. 15.- right down to the left slightly, Left down right, Lights – clear. 16.- right clearly Left – forked. 17. clearly the right and the Left horizontally. 18. clearly the right and the Left horizontally. 19.- right - horizontal, Left visible bad Lights – clear. 20.- right - up, left, Left disappeared. 21.- right – down. 22.- clearly right, Lights a little forked down. 23.- clearly right, Lights a little forked down. 24.- clearly right, Lights a little forked down. 25.- right clear Lights – clear. 26.- right clear Lights – clear. 27.- right clear Lights – clear. After removal of the camera object is not visible, the approach appears, but above the place where he vanished from the image. The third fragment immediately without a space after the second fragment from 43 to 70 second full material: the Object again in the form of an elongated bottom of the ball with the glow at the bottom, the flare of something dark from the bottom of the object. Small defocusing on 25 and 26 seconds, and a complete focus on the 27 seconds from the beginning of the preview of the third fragment. Always see a long dark plume of something coming out of the bottom of the object, about eight times the size of the object itself. The train is constantly deflected to the right and left that talks about frequently changing the direction of movement of the object. If we assume that the object hovered, can so often change the direction of flow of the air at the same height, assuming that they deflect the plume. I do not know. A separate entry is made through 62 seconds after the object disappeared from the image. The object takes the form of a ball (the fourth second), then a shape resembling two stacked bases of the pyramid (the fifth and eighth seconds), without any glow or trail. Its form is irregular, it is noticeable on the image, refocuses often disappears from the image. Complete disappearance at the ninth second (9) and a short appearance on the second of the twelfth (12) of the object in the lower right part of the image with immediate defocusing. Review the steps and this video. After these two records are well visible in binoculars on clear sky, the object suddenly disappeared and the more I discovered it was not. The ball would have not gone anywhere. With regard to the defocusing of the image is checked for other remote moving objects under the same conditions, no defocusing. No way does this impact on relieving equipment? Note - on the TV LCD the fifth generation when viewed from the stick a split object is not visible. To observe the splitting of the object must be connected to the computer's large screen, the more the better, and to increase the contrast while decreasing the brightness of the image for a clearer observation of small and distant objects. But on TV with the flash object is visible is more convenient, so as not to interfere with the split – they are in the form of a light spot, if the object is large, and it is not clear a split, if the object is small in the image. But such a view does not give the opportunity to see every frame. For human resources only on the computer. I used the program Media Player Classic – Home Cinema – after stopping for a pause, to press the symbol in the bottom control bar, 24 pressing one second image viewing.

Video is divided into three fragments. Two of them (except the first) is placed on the channel of the author on YouTube.

The survey was conducted in 21-18. Dome-shaped object moving uniformly emitting from the bottom of a small dark puff of smoke. In the second half of the movie around object circling bird.

penza_nlo_004.jpg

As in the previous plot, the most likely version is that the object is a sky lantern. Smoke and a bright flame at the bottom of the object (most likely from the burner) indirectly confirm this version: as you know, some burners are low quality can smoke.

The third video from 02.06.2013

Video from 02.06.13 (fragment)

June 2, 2013, 21.34 (time adjusted due to installation errors on the camera). The entire record of 1 minute 48 seconds. Viewing on the big screen TV Samsung 40 smart when you connect it to the computer, the contrast is great, brightness is reduced to obtain the dense twilight on the screen. The object in the form of a fly (of the heart), glow down no color visible greenish with a red light over the horizon from the sun, is reduced with the rotation of the sharp end down or moves out of the way to the horizon, or maybe both. Sometimes loses focus, but quickly recovered. Object dropping (out) quickly and systematically, if the spiral rotates in 24 seconds, it moves from the top bright clouds visible at the time of 1 min. 14 sec. to the horizon (forest). Cloud, visible at the time of 1 minutes and 39 seconds on the image as the top in the middle of the image, the object is at time 52 sec., recording started early. You can define the beginning of trajectory – it is to the right and above the highest visible on the image of the cloud. Motion in a straight line downwards from right to left. My conclusion, as the object began to move only after you start shooting, refocused, disappears and reappears, the rotation of the spiral and the movement as a whole is periodic, not chaotic, then it can't be just a heart on the decline, and its form is not similar to the ones presented in the Internet, side view similar to a short cylindrical pencil. Find something similar. And together with those described below, the conclusion becomes clear. Namely, When observing closer to the horizon of this object, a second object more remote, but well observed in the step-by-step viewing. At the end of recording is visible to the third object, but as the record ends, he is seen briefly. Time of 1 minute 39 seconds of the Second view image, the top in relation to being above the horizon first, the object comes out from behind the house to the left in the middle of the image and moves to the right, split in two horizontally, local items clear. The first (bottom) object still visible above the horizon. If you continue browsing on the steps split the top decreases, while less clear, the underdog, the silhouette as if catching up with a clear silhouette ahead of him and already on the fourth step viewing. After another three steps clear, as if two silhouettes merged. The object above the horizon (bottom) is slightly split in two horizontally and the area (seen on the post near the bottom of the object). Another step the object is above the horizon clear, and the top split in two horizontally. Another step the top as one point hardly distinguishable, lower – clear the area - clear. Two step – top visible contrast, the lower clearly, the area clearly. Another step the top has been weakened in contrast. Two step – top is slightly forked. Two step – top clearly. Two more steps – upper bifurcated substantially horizontally, the bottom - clear the area – clear!!! One step closer everything is clear. Another step the upper bifurcated substantially horizontally, the bottom - clear the area – clear!!! Five steps – the lower left edge of the forest, the top visible, but it is bad. Another step top have dramatically increased in size and became very well visible. Another step top split horizontally. Another step top split horizontally. Another step the top clearly. Once all three steps top clearly. One more step – the top split up, the area is split horizontally. Another step the top clearly. Another step top split horizontally. Another step top split horizontally. One more step – the top split up. Another step the top clearly. All subsequent seventeen steps split the top, but in different direction, the terrain clearly. Another step top poorly marked. Another step the top clearly. One more step and the top is completely gone!!! (after just a great monitor). The subsequent fourteen steps to the top visible in the image, but from one step to the contrast of it being lost to extinction. Separately about the object on the right – he appears on the fourteenth step, from the moment the object left the house. It appears just above the blue clouds, moving to the left down over the horizon, comes on a blue cloud and disappears. It is very small and soft, but still audible. His observation is short – with the appearance of only 43 steps, he disappeared before reaching the horizon when they caught up with top object. Changing the contrast during observations of this object, sometimes barely distinguishable. At the last second of the recording in the image above there is a new object, moving down, he forked up considerably. Very much like a bird swift in flight with outstretched wings, but the image area is not split in any way. Moreover, you will have to take on faith, I'm not surprised the shape of this object because it is a form object before I started shooting. I still thought it was a crane hovers over the lake, when looked through binoculars, but immediately realized that it was not a bird, as it was fixed, and what I took to be wings, it was the middle of the object. When shooting at a small display of a camera I hadn't realized that the shape of the object has changed, but at the end of the shooting still seemed to be in the sky for a while motionless in the beginning of my observations.

Shooting 21-34. The object has a domed shape with two peaks. During the entire time of shooting the object is rapidly going down.

penza_nlo_005.jpg

A frame from the video. Object, side view.

penza_nlo_006.jpg

A frame from the video. Object, front view.

The object has a faint red-orange glow at the bottom. We can assume that it is a sky lantern, made in the form of a stylized heart-shaped, symbol of love:

penza_nlo_007.jpg

Shooting ends with the loss of focus of the camera: all the objects in the frame began to lose sharpness and merged.

Two frames of this video were also found flying bird, taken close up, on one – from a distance. Since the angular velocity of a bird relative to the camera was very high, one video frame etched a few strokes of a bird's wing, which led to very interesting effects.

penza_nlo_008.jpg

penza_nlo_009.jpg

penza_nlo_010.jpg

To those obtained for photo or video images of birds and insects, some researchers call skayfish, or rods.

The fourth video from 02.06.2014

Video from 02.06.14 (analogue sent)

The object record 2.6.14 G. 21.03 (time adjusted due to the incorrect installation in the chamber). The whole record lasts 44 seconds. The object above the treeline, is visible from the second of the twelfth (12) start recording. Object splits and converges again into a single point, changes the shape (see photo), some times the picture is a little refocused. The object disappears from the image on the second sixteenth (16) after defocus. After removal of the camera and its zooming out in the same place there. He was plus five heights of the trees that under it, up. The last frames is enough visible space on which to locate the object if it was something of a slow-moving ball, because the shooting location was out of focus and was not in sufficient approximation only seventeen seconds (17) – from 16 to 33 seconds. Even on the final approach to the thirty-sixth second (36) object could still be seen – juxtaposing photos, attach them with the notes. The largest object is observed from 15 to 16 seconds. During this time (while viewing step by step) the object is split in different directions and at different distance, with the object clearly visible twelve (12) times out of thirty-three (33) steps viewing. And it's for one second, mind you. The photo shows how this time is changing the shape of the object. Short-term out-of-focus occur on the ninth and fourteenth seconds. Later in the same approximation, defocus no, I think because that object is not there and has no impact. My conclusions – balls and lanterns do not behave.

The survey was conducted in 21-03. The object appeared in the shot with 4 seconds to 12. The rest of the time the camera lost focus (all objects in the frame began to lose sharpness and merge).

The most clear frame of the video object:

penza_nlo_011.jpg

Unfortunately, to say anything definite about the nature of the object is not possible due to low detail. As it can be heavenly with a flashlight, and have another nature.

Night mode. Video from 01.07.2012

Night shot of the object, which was conducted in 22.37. Video of bright, glowing object.

The rosary frame:

penza_nlo_012.jpg

As in the previous case, this video is not possible with a high degree of certainty to draw a conclusion about the nature of the object.

Conclusion

Everything in the video, close enough to see details, have common grounds on which to assume that the objects to be shot is sky lanterns.

On video # 3 the object has not the usual form and is similar to sky lantern in the shape of "heart".

Finally, a video from 02.06.2014 and night video from 01.07.2012 too poor quality in order to be able to make any definite conclusions about the nature of depicted objects.

If we accept the hypothesis that objects are sky lanterns, it is safe to say that the poor health of the inhabitants and the unusual silence in no way connected with these objects and have a different nature. Even with the warning that poor quality lights may pose a threat of chemical poisoning [1], this outcome from a single run for a city is extremely unlikely.

Additional materials

Channel Yuri Anatolyevich on YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6kqKJPNPSAN7HIBPjbqeyA

TV shows:

"Service 11" from 11.06.13

"Service 11" from on 06.06.14

TV3 "X version"

All of our group members we thank Pashnina Yuri Anatolyevich for the cooperation provided materials and vigilance.

Translated by «Yandex.Translator»