| ID | #1569243895 |
| Added | Mon, 23/09/2019 |
| Author | July N. |
| Sources | ‘Cosford: An Enduring Mystery,’ Nick Redfern
|
| Phenomena | |
| Status | Research
|
Initial data
In 1995, viabase Royal air force Cosford, near Wolverhampton, is probably known for its huge Museum which has an impressive collection of vintage military and civilian aircraft. However, more than thirty years ago Cosford for a short time became famous for quite another reason.
Around 23:30 PM December 10, 1963, a UFO in the shape of a dome landed at the base, filled the area with a beam of green light was seen from a close distance by at least two students of the air force. At least this was a common story over the past three decades.
In accordance with the "thirty years by a decision of the British government", eighty pages of the Ministry of defense was recently declassified and is now available for inspection in the State archives.
Rumors that something unusual happened at the base, appeared almost immediately, but only at the beginning of January 1964. January 9, Wilfred Daniels, an investigator for a UFO from Stafford, had the opportunity to speak with Reverend B. G. Henry, chaplain at RAF Cosford, and asked him some questions relating to the alleged close encounter.
We can't be sure what really was said during their brief conversation (both men recalled their "conversation" is noticeably different), but there was controversy that has raged for months. In a letter dated 13 April 1964 Overni Girvan, the editor of the magazine Flying Saucer Review, Wilfred Daniels said:
"Flight Lieutenant Henry said that the publication of his name will cause him problems and that it was "more than the worth of his work," to arrange a meeting between me and two RAF students that he really shouldn't be talking to me about it at all."
For its part, the memories of the Reverend Henry was in some degree opposite of the memories of Daniel. In a letter to flying officer R. A. Roberts from Cosford to air Ministry Whitehall stated that flight Lieutenant Henry "categorically denies all assigned readings". Roberts also added that a chaplain "is seriously considering the prosecution".
To his credit, Overni Girvan decided to unravel the mystery and wrote a bunch of letters to Cosford and aviation Ministry. As Girvan pointed out to the staff at Cosford, the government offered several conflicting explanations to explain the incident: "Nothing at all", "two drunken students", "deception" and that somewhat funny, "paravoz British Railways" was the various theories put forward by the Ministry of aviation in its efforts to suppress interest in the case.
Girvan gave this incident a place of honor in the next issue of Flying Saucer Review, wrote a great article on this case in the Kensington News and West London Times. Commenting on the "contradictory explanations" of the government, Girvan said, "What's so desperately trying to hide the Ministry of aviation?"
Preferring not to lower the head the Ministry of aviation was buzzing behind closed doors. By may of that year, the controversy began to subside.
Translated by «Yandex.Translator»
Original news
In 1995, the Royal Air Force facility at Cosford, near Wolverhampton, is probably known for its huge museum which is home to an impressive collection of vintage military and civil aircraft. More than thirty years ago, however, Cosford became briefly famous for an entirely different reason.
At around 11.30pm on the evening of December 10, 1963, a dome-shaped UFO touched down on the base, bathed the surrounding area in a beam of green light, and was seen at close quarters by at least two RAF apprentices. At least, that has been the accepted story for the last three decades. In accordance with the British Government’s ‘thirty year ruling’ the Ministry of Defence’s eighty page file on the case has recently been declassified and is now available for inspection at the Public Record Office. Its contents make for interesting reading.
Rumours that something extraordinary had occurred at the base surfaced almost immediately, but it was not until early January 1964 that matters escalated. On January 9, Wilfred Daniels, a UFO investigator from Stafford, had the opportunity to speak with Reverend B.G. Henry, the Chaplain at RAF Cosford, and duly put to him a number of questions relative to the alleged close encounter.
We cannot be sure what was actually said during the course of their brief conversation (both men recalled their ‘chat’ in markedly different ways), but a controversy was created which raged for months. In an April 13, 1964 letter to Waverney Girvan, editor of Flying Saucer Review magazine, Wilfred Daniels reported: “Flight Lieutenant Henry said that publication of his name would cause him trouble; that it was ‘more than his job was worth’ to arrange a meeting between me and the two RAF apprentices; that he really ought not to be talking to me about it at all; that security had dropped right down on the whole thing.”
For his part, Reverend Henry’s recollection were somewhat opposed to those of Daniels. A letter from Flying Officer R.A. Roberts at Cosford, to the Air Ministry at Whitehall, stated that Flight Lieutenant Henry “categorically denies all statements attributed to him”. Flying Officer Roberts further added that the chaplain was “seriously considering taking legal action”.
To his credit, Waverney Girvan resolved to get to the bottom of the mystery, and fired off a barrage of letters to both Cosford and the Air Ministry. As Girvan pointed out to the staff at Cosford, several contradictory explanations had been offered by the authorities to explain the encounter: ‘Nothing at all’, ‘two drunk apprentices’, ‘a hoax’, and, somewhat amusingly, ‘a British Railways steam train’ were the various theories mooted by the Air Ministry in its attempts to squelch interest in the case. Smelling a rat, Girvan gave the incident pride of place in the next issue of Flying Saucer Review, and write a lengthy article on the case in the Kensington News and West London Times. Commenting on the Government’s ‘self-contradictory explanations’, Girvan said: ‘What is it that the Air Ministry is trying so desperately to hide?’
Preferring to keep its head down, the Air Ministry fumed behind closed doors. Of particular concern to the Air Ministry, the media persisted in promoting the case: ‘…the Express and Star of Wolverhampton, in spite of seeking the Station’s views, reported the boys’ claim….,’ grumbled the Ministry in an internal memorandum of March 12, 1964.
By May of that same year, the controversy had begun to die down and normality returned to RAF Cosford. The pro-UFO facrtions continued to champion the case, while the Air Ministry was more than happy to play the matter down.
So, what exactly did happen on that long gone winter’s evening in December 1963? On the plus side, Waverney Girvan was a much-respected individual, well-known for his diligent researches. In addition, Wilfred Daniels had served in the military at the level of Captain – an equally credible source. Moreover, it is a proven fact that the Air Ministry did offer a variety of contradictory explanations in its attempt to dismiss the case.
On the other hand, the negative aspects of the case have to be addressed. Flight Lieutenant Henry was adamant that he had been misquoted by Wilfred Daniels; the possibility of him taking legal action was discussed in inter-departmental memos. Furthermore, a handwritten note which originated with the Air Ministry stated that with respect to the two apprentices who reported seeing the UFO: ‘I believe the two boys in question wanted to get out of the survive – and we should not have been sorry to see them go.’
However, if nothing untoward occurred, why did the Air Ministry feel the need to offer a variety of ever-changing explanations as it sought to diffuse both public and media interest in the event?
In the final analysis, whatever truth lies behind the alleged 1963 UFO encounter at RAF Cosford, of only one thing we can be truly certain: with the release of the Government’s eighty page file on the incident, the decades-old controversy looks certain to resurface.
Hypotheses
Investigation
Resume
Log in or register to post comments
