Site statistics

34509 facts from 176 countries related to 1176 phenomena have been registered in Archive. 2800 of them were solved, another 10665 are under verification for compliance with one of the 319 versions.

6 facts have been added for last 24 hours.

Share your story

You are in "Archive" section

This section contains descriptions of unexplained facts provided by eyewitnesses or published in the media, as well as the results of their analysis by the group.

UFO. United States

ID #1604761309
Added Sat, 07/11/2020
Author July N.
Sources
Phenomena
Status
Hypothesis

Initial data

Initial information from sources or from an eyewitness
Incident date: 
08.10.1978 07:00
Location: 
Дженкинс, MO
United States

Several (7) witnesses from a farming family noticed an unusual object in a field South of their home.

The object was 285 feet (88.5 m) from the house, and at this distance it was difficult to see. It looked like a medium-sized white object, but it looked like it was probably a large piece of paper that had been blown in the night before. At that time, the family did not go to examine it.

Six family members [5 adults and a teenager] stole glances in his direction for the next two hours, but nothing moved.

Then, at 9am, the farm owner left the house to do some chores. At this point, the object rapidly rose from the ground to a height of 30-50 feet (9-15 m). Everyone else ran out of the house to look. It moved slowly and noiselessly to the West, rose quickly, turned twice, and gradually flew away.

Witnesses noticed that a second, larger and more distant object also appeared to be in the sky. These objects came in close proximity and moved together.

The landed object was described as an oval or egg-shaped shape that appears white on the ground, but is more silvery reflective as it rises into the air.

Its size was estimated as 4-5 feet (1.2-1.5 m) in the longer dimension and 3-4 feet (0.9-1.2 m) in the shorter one. One section of the surface was darker in tone, which allowed witnesses to notice that it was rotating at a speed of about once every two seconds.

Witnesses immediately called the Sheriff's office. A Sheriff's Deputy arrived in the afternoon and went to the landing site, took pictures, and took soil samples.

There was a noticeable footprint that was 4.5 feet (1.3 m) long and 3.5 feet (1 m) wide. The nature of the footprint was described as indented, not burned, and not dried. Soil moisture was normal. The force pressing down on the Ground was not as great as it was measured by penetrometric tests. No elevated radioactive indicators were also measured.

[We owe all these tests, the expert on the trail of Ted Phillips.]

Over time, however, there was some easily noticeable deterioration of the grass, selectively within the track. The only slightly reasonable alternative hypothesis that Phillips and Koufos could come up with was something related to the weather balloon.

Some efforts were made to test such launches, but the only known source of them was in the completely wrong wind direction. The fast take-off speed also contradicts this theory among several other things that could be mentioned.

Another note: when the farmer arrived at the scene, he said that the grass on the site was very noticeably twisted.

This case was also reported in MUFON magazine, where there were several discrepancies. It reports the trail as a tripod of indented spots in the area of indented and swirled grass. At one point in the article, the trace is described as “burnt”, but a more detailed reading seems to indicate that “discolored” may be a better word.

Testing of MUFON in the College's lab showed no unusual substances or volatile organic substances such as solvents. MUFON found out that this farmer had previously taken one of the weather balloons from the local service and knew exactly what they looked like.

CUFOS’ and MUFON's reports match in almost every detail, and the trail described by MUFON is probably the best detail.

In addition, witnesses describe their cows and a "local" wandering coyote as just looking at the object and not getting excited in any way.

Original news

Date:  October 8 1978
Location:  Jenkins, MO
Time:  7:00 AM.
Summary:   Multiple (7) witness, two objects, one on ground two hours, 180 ft away, traces. A farming family noted an unusual object in a field to the south of their house. The object was 285 feet from the house and at that distance, difficult to see. It appeared as a white object of moderate size, but was felt to be probably a large piece of paper blown there over the previous evening. The family did not go over to inspect it at that time. The six family members [5 adults and a teenager] stole occasional glances in its direction over the next two hours but nothing moved. Then, at 9am, the farm owner left the house to do some chores. At that moment, the object rapidly rose from the ground to a height of 30 to 50 feet. Everyone else ran out of the house to watch. It began moving slowly and silently to the west, ascended rapidly, turned twice, and gradually flew away. The witnesses noted that a second larger and more distant object seemed also to be in the sky. These objects came into close approximation and moved off together. The landed object was described as an oval or egg shape appearing white on the ground but more silvery reflective once airborne. Its size was judged to be 4-5 feet in the longer dimension, and 3-4 feet in the shorter. One area of the surface was darker in tone, and allowed the witnesses to note that it was rotating at about a once per two seconds rate. The witnesses immediately called the sheriff’s department. A deputy arrived in the afternoon and went to the landing site, took pictures, as well as soil samples. There was a noticeable trace which measured 4 1/2 feet long and 3 1/2 feet wide. The character of the trace was described as depressed, not burnt nor dried. Soil moisture was normal. The force bearing down on the ground was not great as measured by penetrometer tests. No radioactive heightened readings were measured either. [We owe all these tests to the field’s trace expert, Ted Phillips.] As time went on though, there was some easily noticeable deterioration of the grass, selectively within the trace. The only slightly reasonable alternate hypothesis that Phillips and CUFOS were able to come up with, was something involving a weather balloon. Some effort was made to check for such launches but the only known source was in the entirely wrong wind direction. The fast take-off speed is also against this theory among several other things one might mention. One other note, when the farmer arrived at the scene he said that the grass at the site was very noticeably swirled. This case was also reported in the MUFON Journal where there were a few discrepancies. MUFON reports the trace as a tripod of depressed spots within an area of depressed and swirled grass. At one point in the article the trace is described as “burnt” but more reading seems to indicate that “discolored” might be a better word. “Like a spot which has been over-fertilized”. Testing by MUFON at a college laboratory showed no unusual chemicals or volatile organics, such as solvents. It was found by MUFON that that farmer had previously recovered one of the weather balloons from the local service and knew perfectly well what they looked like. CUFOS’ and MUFON’s reports agree on almost all details, and the trace as described by MUFON is probably the better detail. As an aside, the witnesses describe their cows and a “local” meandering coyote as merely staring at the object and not agitated in any way.
Source:  International UFO Reporter Vol. 3 # 12, December 1978; MUFON Journal #135, May 1979; and follow up by Phillips in #141, November 1979; plus, Joplin(MO) Globe, October 24, 1978.

Hypotheses

List of versions containing features matching the eyewitness descriptions or material evidence

Balloon/Weather Balloon

The balloon (simplified is a balloon) — an aircraft lighter than air, where the lift force is used enclosed in a sheath gas (or heated air) with a density less than the density of the surrounding air.

Distinguish between tethered, Svobodnaya and balloons — powered airships.

Investigation

Versions testing, their confirmation or refutation. Additional information, notes during the study of materials
Not enough information

Resume

The most likely explanation. The version, confirmed by the investigation
Not enough information

Similar facts


Log in or register to post comments

Site friends

  • Мир тайн — сайт о таинственном
  • Activite-Paranormale
  • UFOlats
  • Новый Бестиарий
  • The Field Reports
  • UFO Meldpunt Nederland
  • GRUPO DE ESTUDOS DE UFOLOGIA CIENTÍFICA
  • Паранормальная наука, наука об аномалиях
  • Новости уфологии
  • UFO Insights
  • Mundo Ovnis

Attention!

18+

Site contains materials that are not recommended for impressionable people.

You are reporting a typo in the following text:
Simply click the "Send typo report" button to complete the report. You can also include a comment.