Site statistics

34479 facts from 176 countries related to 1176 phenomena have been registered in Archive. 2799 of them were solved, another 10644 are under verification for compliance with one of the 319 versions.

18 facts have been added for last 24 hours.

Share your story

You are in "Archive" section

This section contains descriptions of unexplained facts provided by eyewitnesses or published in the media, as well as the results of their analysis by the group.

UFO. Belgium

ID #1612429332
Added Thu, 04/02/2021
Author July N.
Sources
Phenomena
Status
Hypothesis

Initial data

Initial information from sources or from an eyewitness
Incident date: 
29.11.1989
Location: 
Belgium

From October 1989 to 1990, hundreds of reports of illuminated objects, often described as huge and triangular in shape, were reported in Belgium. Supersonic F-16 aircraft chased these strange objects, which were simultaneously tracked by both airborne and ground-based radars. The Belgian Government has fully cooperated with civilian UFO researchers, which is unprecedented in the history of government intervention in this area.

The Chief of Operations of the Royal Belgian Air Force, Colonel Wilfred De Brauer (now Major General and Deputy Chief of the Belgian Air Force), created a special operational unit to work closely with the gendarmerie to investigate incidents as soon as they were reported. Among the thousands of witnesses were many military and police officers, pilots, scientists and engineers. The wave was documented by the Belgian Society for the Study of Space Phenomena (SOBEPS), a private organization based in Brussels, which has published two thick volumes on the UFO wave.

The first important case was the observation by several witnesses of a strange plane, which was reported by gendarmes during a patrol near the town of Eupen, near the border with Germany. Auguste Messin, professor of physics at the Catholic University of Louvain and scientific consultant to SOBEPS, summarized the case:

"On November 29, 1989, a large triangular ship flew over the city of Eupen. Gendarmes von Montigny and Nicol found him near the road connecting Aix-la-Chapelle and Eupen. He was motionless in the air above the field, which he illuminated with three powerful beams. 

The rays came from large circular surfaces near the corners of the triangle. In the center of the dark, flat base was a sort of "red rotating beacon". The object didn't make any noise. As it began to move, the gendarmes headed for a small road in the area over which they expected the object to fly. 

Instead, he made a half-turn and moved slowly in the direction of Eupen, following the road at a low altitude. It was seen by various witnesses as it flew over the houses and near the city hall."

In the fall and winter of 1989-1990. Sightings continued to be recorded by SOBEPS and the gendarmerie. Most of the witnesses reported seeing dark triangular objects with white lights at the corners and a red flashing light in the middle. It is said that many objects hovered, and some of them suddenly accelerated to a very high speed. Most of the objects didn't make a sound, but some of them made a faint hum, like an electric motor.

Public interest in the wave peaked with the radar-visual and jet scrambling incident on the night of March 30-31, 1990. This clash was seen and reported by hundreds of citizens. 

A preliminary report prepared by Major P. Lambrechts of the Belgian Air Force General Staff was transmitted to SOBEPS. 

The "Report on the UFO sightings on the night of March 30 to 31, 1990" includes a detailed chronology of events and refutes several hypotheses, such as optical illusions, balloons, meteorological inversions, military aircraft, holographic projections, etc.

The incident began at 22: 50 on March 30, when the gendarmerie called the radar "chief dispatcher in Glonse" and reported "three unusual lights forming an equilateral triangle". In the next few minutes, the gendarmes confirmed the presence of the lights. When the NATO facility in Semmerzak discovered an unknown target at 23: 49, it was decided to take off two F-16 fighters. The planes took off at 0: 05. from the nearest air base, Bovechen, on March 31, and flew just over an hour. According to Major Lambrecht's report:

"The aircraft had short radar contacts several times, [but the pilots] ... We have never made visual contact with a UFO ... every time the pilots managed to capture the capture of one of the targets for a few seconds, this led to a sharp change in the behavior of the detected targets… [During the first capture at 0: 13], their speed changed in minimum time from 150 to 970 knots [170 to 1,100 mph and 275 to 1,800 km / h] and from 9,000 to 5,000 feet [2,700 m to 1,500 m], then returning to 11,000 feet [3,300 m] to move back to ground level."

Electronic Warfare Center (EWC) The Air Force conducted a much more detailed technical analysis of the F-16's computerized radar tapes under the direction of Colonel Salmon and physicist M. Gilmard. Their research was completed in 1992 and was later reviewed by Professor Messen.

Although many aspects of the case still remain unexplained, Messen and SOBEPS mostly accepted the Gilmard-Salmon hypothesis that some of the radar contacts were indeed "angels" caused by a rare meteorological phenomenon. This became apparent in the four captures, "when the object descended to the ground with calculations showing a negative [emphasis added] altitude ... It was obviously impossible for an object to penetrate the earth, but it was possible that the earth could act as a mirror.

Messen explained how the high speeds measured by the Doppler radar of F-16 fighter jets could be the result of interference effects. However, he notes that there is another radar trace, the explanation of which is not yet available. As for visual observations of this event by gendarmes and other people,

In a recent interview, Major General De Brauer summarized his thoughts on this complex case:

"I was most impressed by the witnesses, some of whom I know personally, and they convinced me that something was really going on. They were reliable people, and they clearly told what they saw.

We are always looking for opportunities that can cause errors in radar systems. We can't rule out electromagnetic interference, but of course we can't rule out the possibility that there were objects in the air. In at least one case, a correlation was found between the radar contacts of one ground-based radar and one F-16 fighter. This weakens the theory that all radar contacts were caused by electromagnetic interference. If we add up all the possibilities, the question will remain open, so there is no final answer."

The wave of Belgian UFOs brought a huge number of cases of good quality, as well as a lot of videos and photos. One strikingly clear photograph of the triangular-shaped ship was taken in Petit-Reschen in early April 1990. As of 1994, it remained unexplained after numerous analyses, including a thorough computer study at the Royal Military Academy. (see below)

Although public interest in the Belgian wave peaked in the period 1990-91, SOBEPS was still documenting cases in late 1993. Mark Welkener have listed the main characteristics of the Belgian UFO in the latest study, SOBEPS. Various shapes were reported, such as round, rectangular, and cigar-shaped, but the wave was dominated by triangular objects. 

Some of their characteristics included:

  • Uneven displacement (zigzag, instantaneous change of trajectory, etc.).
  • Moving along the contours of the terrain.
  • Different travel speeds (including very slow movement).
  • Stationary flight (hovering).
  • Flyby of urban and industrial centers.
  • Sound effects (faint buzzing... until complete silence).

Since most of the Belgian sightings described triangular-shaped objects, many European and American researchers and journalists assumed that they were caused by either F-117A stealth fighters or some other revolutionary secret US military aircraft. However, the only truly unusual characteristic of the F-117 is its near-invisibility to radar and infrared detection - it looks, flies, and sounds like any other subsonic jet. Similar claims about the presence of other American advanced aircraft are even more difficult to justify: the A-12 Avenger II was never built, and the existence of the TR-3A "Manta" is not confirmed. Rumor has it that none of them will be able to fly as reported for Belgian UFOs.

Despite the fact that the hypothesis of a secret military aircraft has been repeatedly officially refuted by the Ministry of Defense and the Belgian Air Force, as well as the US Embassy in Brussels and the US Office of Military Intelligence, some publications continue to defend secrecy. theory of a fighter.

In a letter to French researcher Renaud Maric, the Minister of Defense during the UFO wave, Leo Delcroix, wrote:

"Unfortunately, no explanation has yet been found. The nature and origin of the phenomenon remain unknown. However, one theory can be finally refuted, since the American authorities have convincingly assured the Belgian armed forces that no American test flights have ever been conducted»

Original news

From October 1989 throughout 1990, hundreds of reports of lighted objects, frequently described as enormous and triangular in shape were recorded in Belgium. Air Force supersonic F-16 jets chased these strange objects, which were simultaneously tracked by both airborne and ground radars. The Belgian Government cooperated fully with civilian UFO investigators, an action without precedent in the history of government involvement in this field.

The Chief of Operations of the Royal Belgian Air Force, Colonel Wilfred De Brouwer (now Major General and Deputy Chief of the Belgian Air Force), set up a Special Task Force Unit to work closely with the Gendarmerie to investigate the sightings as soon as they were reported. Among the thousands of witnesses were many military and police officers, pilots, scientists and engineers. The wave was documented by the Belgian Society for the Study of Space Phenomena (SOBEPS), a private organization from Brussels, which published two thick volumes on the UFO wave. 133 (see montage)

The first important case was a multiple-witness observation of a strange aircraft, reported by gendarmes on patrol near the town of Eupen, not far from the German border. Auguste Meessen, professor of physics at the Catholic University in Louvain and a scientific consultant of SOBEPS, summarized the case:

“On November 29, 1989, a large craft with triangular shape flew over the town of Eupen. The gendarmes von Montigny and Nicol found it near the road linking Aix-la-Chapelle and Eupen. It was stationary in the air, above a field which it illuminated with three powerful beams. The beams emanated from large circular surfaces near the triangle’s corners. In the center of the dark and flat understructure there was some kind of ‘red gyrating beacon.’ The object did not make any noise. When it began to move, the gendarmes headed towards a small road in the area over which they expected the object to fly. Instead, it made a half-turn and continued slowly in the direction of Eupen, following the road at low altitude. It was seen by different witnesses as it flew above houses and near City Hall.”134

Sightings continued to be logged by SOBEPS and the Gendarmerie during the fall and winter of 1989-1990. Most witnesses described seeing dark, triangular objects with white lights at the corners and a red flashing light in the middle. Many of the objects were said to have hovered, with some of them then suddenly accelerating to a very high speed. Most of the objects made no sound, but some were said to have emitted a faint humming like an electric motor.

Public interest in the wave reached its peak with a radar/visual and jet scramble incident on the night of March 30-31, 1990. This scramble was seen and reported by hundreds of citizens. A preliminary report prepared by Major P. Lambrechts of the Belgian Air Force General Staff was released to SOBEPS. The “Report concerning the observation of UFOs during the night of March 30 to 31, 1990,” includes a detailed chronology of events and dismisses several hypotheses such as optical illusions, balloons, meteorological inversions, military aircraft, holographic projections, etc.

The incident began at 22:50 hrs. on March 30 when the Gendarmerie telephoned the radar “master controller at Glons” to report “three unusual lights forming an equilateral triangle.” More gendarmes confirmed the lights in the following minutes. When the NATO facility at Semmerzake detected an unknown target at 23:49 hrs., a decision to scramble two F-16 fighters was made. The jets took off at 0:05 hrs. from Beauvechain, the nearest air base, on March 31 and flew for just over an hour. According to Major Lambrecht’s report:

“The aircraft had brief radar contacts on several occasions, [but the pilots]… at no time established visual contact with the UFOs… each time the pilots were able to secure a lock on one of the targets for a few seconds, there resulted a drastic change in the behavior of the detected targets… [During the first lock-on at 0:13 hrs.] their speed changed in a minimum of time from 150 to 970 knots [170 to 1,100 mph and 275 to 1,800 km./hr.] and from 9,000 to 5,000 feet [2,700 m. to 1,500 m.], returning then to 11,000 feet [3,300 m.] in order to change again to close to ground level.”135

The Electronic War Center (EWC) of the Air Force undertook a much more detailed technical analysis of the F-16 computerized radar tapes, led by Col. Salmon and physicist M. Gilmard. Their study was completed in 1992 and was later reviewed by Professor Meessen.

Although many aspects of this case still remain unexplained, Meessen and SOBEPS have basically accepted the Gilmard-Salmon hypothesis that some of the radar contacts were really “angels” caused by a rare meteorological phenomenon. This became evident in four lock-ons, “where the object descended to the ground with calculations showing negative [emphasis added] altitude… It was evidently impossible that an object could penetrate the ground, but it was possible that the ground could act as a mirror.” Meessen explained how the high velocities measured by the Doppler radar of the F-16 fighters might result from interference effects. He points out, however, that there is another radar trace for which there is no explanation to date. As for the visual sightings of this event by the gendarmes and others, Meessen suggests that they could possibly have been caused by stars seen under conditions of “exceptional atmospheric refraction.”136

In a recent interview, Major General De Brouwer summarized his reflections on this complex case:

“What impressed me the most were the witnesses, some of whom I know personally and convinced me that, in fact, something was going on. These were credible people and they told clearly what they saw.

“We always look for possibilities which can cause errors in the radar systems. We can not exclude that there was electromagnetic interference, but of course we can not exclude the possibility that there were objects in the air. On at least one occasion there was a correlation between the radar contacts of one ground radar and one F-16 fighter. This weakens the theory that all radar contacts were caused by electromagnetic interference. If we add all the possibilities, the question is still open, so there is no final answer.”137

The Belgian UFO wave yielded a rich volume of good quality cases and many videos and photographs. One strikingly clear photograph of a triangular-shaped craft was taken at Petit-Rechain in early April 1990. As of 1994, it remained unexplained after numerous analyses, including a thorough computerized study at the Royal Military Academy. (see below)

Although public interest in the Belgian wave reached its peak in the 1990-91 period, SOBEPS was still documenting cases in late 1993. Marc Valckenaer listed the main characteristics of the Belgian UFOs in the latest SOBEPS study. Various shapes such as round, rectangular and cigar were reported, but the wave was dominated by triangular objects. Some of their characteristics included:

“Irregular displacement (zig-zag, instantaneous change of trajectory, etc.).

“Displacement following the contours of the terrain.

“Varying speeds of displacement (including very slow motion).

“Stationary flight (hovering).

“Overflight of urban and industrial centers.

“Sound effects (faint humming… to total silence).”138

Because the bulk of the Belgian sightings described triangular-shaped objects, many European and American researchers and journalists speculated that these were caused by either F-117A stealth fighters or some other revolutionary U.S. secret military aircraft. However, the only truly unusual characteristic of the F-117 is its near-invisibility to radar and infrared detection – it looks, flies and sounds like any other sub-sonic jet airplane. Similar claims about the presence of other American advanced airplanes are even harder to substantiate: the A-12 Avenger II was never built, and the existence of the TR-3A “manta” is unconfirmed. Neither has even been rumored to be able to fly in the manner reported for the Belgian UFOs.

Despite the fact that the secret military aircraft hypothesis has been denied officially over and over again by the Belgian Ministry of Defense and Air Force, as well as by the U.S. Embassy in Brussels and the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, some publications continue to champion the stealth fighter theory.

In a letter to French researcher Renaud Marhic, the Minister of Defense at the time of the UFO wave, Leo Delcroix, wrote:

“Unfortunately, no explanation has been found to date. The nature and origin of the phenomenon remain unknown. One theory can, however, be definitely dismissed since the Belgian Armed Forces have been positively assured by American authorities that there has never been any sort of American aerial test flight.”139

Hypotheses

List of versions containing features matching the eyewitness descriptions or material evidence

False targets on the radar

Marks from unknown unidentified targets appeared on the radar indicator screens. Mysterious reflected signals were also received in a clear atmosphere from areas where there seemed to be nothing…

Investigation

Versions testing, their confirmation or refutation. Additional information, notes during the study of materials
Not enough information

Resume

The most likely explanation. The version, confirmed by the investigation
Not enough information

Similar facts


Log in or register to post comments

Site friends

  • Мир тайн — сайт о таинственном
  • Activite-Paranormale
  • UFOlats
  • Новый Бестиарий
  • The Field Reports
  • UFO Meldpunt Nederland
  • GRUPO DE ESTUDOS DE UFOLOGIA CIENTÍFICA
  • Паранормальная наука, наука об аномалиях
  • Новости уфологии
  • UFO Insights
  • Mundo Ovnis

Attention!

18+

Site contains materials that are not recommended for impressionable people.

You are reporting a typo in the following text:
Simply click the "Send typo report" button to complete the report. You can also include a comment.